Want To develop Millions? Copy Someone’s Cryptocurrency Project.
In late January, Patientory, a software firm that aims to store electronic medical records using a distributed database, caught wind of a worrying development. The Atlanta startup, which had raised more than $7 million from investors, noticed that a proposal outlining its proprietary technology and company vision — better known in the cryptocurrency world as a “white paper” — was also being used to raise money by an unknown company called Dentalfix.
Dentalfix’s origins are unclear, but it appears to fill been a Russia-based seller of tooth repair kits that at some point in recent months decided it could raise money by selling its own cryptocurrency. After one initial coin offering (ICO) failed, the company unveiled a recent website and commerce, trade arrangement in late 2017 for a “health management system,” total with an impressive looking white paper with full pages of text lifted from Patientory’s arrangement.
“We’d like to inform the community that we fill no affiliation with the company, Dentalfix,” Patientory tweeted to its followers on Jan. 23. “The Patientory team was recently notified that Dentalfix is attempting to pass off our whitepaper as their own. We don’t encourage or support plagiarism in any form.” Dentalfix did not respond to requests for comment.
Dentalfix failed to gain traction with potential backers, but its blatant cribbing of mental property is yet another example of faulty actors searching for ways to fleece investors in the fledgling and largely unregulated cryptocurrency market. At a time when a startup with no working product can raise millions of dollars on miniature more than the seed of an plan, shady companies with flashy websites and questionable white papers are looking to capture advantage of unsophisticated investors who might not be able to show the contrast between what’s real and what’s not.
That practice may not disappear unnoticed. The Securities and Exchange Commission reportedly launched a probe final month into dozens of companies and advisers involved with ICOs to examine the way cryptocurrency firms are marketing and selling digital coins. As fragment of that process, the agency may capture a closer contemplate at white papers, which began as documents to justify a project’s concept and technical merits, but fill since been used to set commerce, trade milestones and, sometimes, financial expectations.
A spokesperson for the SEC declined to comment or even confirm the ongoing investigation.
“The crypto community has turned into a version of LA, where everyone is going around with a script in their hand trying to pitch a film.”
In an industry in which most cryptocurrency companies accomplish not fill a working product before they try to raise capital, a white paper may be one of the few pieces of information that developers or investors can employ to assess the viability of a project. The most widely known white paper, Satoshi Nakamoto’s explainer on Bitcoin, conceptualized a “peer-to-peer version of electronic cash [that] would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution.” (That nine-page document made no attempt to speculate on the crazy valuations that fill reach to define current Bitcoin mania.)
“I read the white paper typically fairly early on to see whether it’s something I’d be interested in, and to see what design flaws they actually fill,” Arianna Simpson, a managing partner at venture capital fund Autonomous Ventures, told BuzzFeed News.
The problem, however, according to Simpson is that with a lot of startups shilling their recent coins, it’s become “tough to distinguish who is serious and who is not.” Advisory companies and even contract workers on freelance sites like Upwork and Fiverr offer services to compose white papers, while the hasty-moving, speculative nature of cryptocurrency — and the fact that pretty much anyone with a bank account can invest — suggests that fewer people are evaluating them on their technical merits or even reading their white papers.
“The crypto community has turned into a version of LA, where everyone is going around with a script in their hand trying to pitch a film,” Emin Gün Sirer, an associate professor in Cornell’s computer science department, told BuzzFeed News. The amount of interest and money to be made has incentivized faulty actors, he added, pointing to the “abject plagiarism” of Tron, a cryptocurrency that currently has a market capitalization of $2.3 billion according to CoinMarketCap.com, despite being accused of copying another company’s work.
In January, Juan Benet, an entrepreneur behind Filecoin, a data storage network with an application token that raised $257 million, claimed that the Tron white paper included language from his proposal and others with “zero references.” He included a diagram showing fabric he alleged had been copied. Tron’s creator Justin Sun, a Chinese entrepreneur who claims to be a protégé of Alibaba CEO Jack Ma, replied insisting that the similarities between the two papers were the result of a translation issue. Tron, which says it’s constructing “a global free content entertainment system utilizing blockchain technology” subsequently scrubbed its website of the original white paper and uploaded a recent one — but not before its market capitalization rapidly dropped from its height of $12 billion.
to assess the accusations against Tron, BuzzFeed News asked Quetext, a plagiarism analysis company, to compare Tron and Filecoin’s white papers. Quetext assigned a similarity score of more than 15%, and highlighted whole diagrams, passages, and chunks of phrases that were shared between the two. (For comparison, Dentalfix’s white paper had a 99.9% similarity score to Patientory’s.)
Benet did not respond to multiple requests for comment. Sun, who often tweets approximately his company’s close ties to Alibaba and does miniature to dispel rumors that Tron might partner with e-commerce behemoth, didn’t respond to requests for comment, either. A source close to Alibaba told BuzzFeed News that the e-commerce giant has no plans to work with the cryptocurrency company and that Ma has no protégés. (After BuzzFeed News reached out to Sun with questions approximately his relationship with Ma, references to the Alibaba CEO disappeared from the Tron website.)
“Tron is a befuddling and concerning case,” said venture capitalist Chris Burniske approximately its market capitalization, which places it among the top 15 most valuable digital tokens. “The people behind the currency incessantly promote exchange listings, emphasize partnerships, and otherwise employ flashy techniques to induce, enable, and sustain irrational exuberance.”
While Tron’s price has dropped from the dizzying prices of January, it’s unclear how much longer it can sustain that exuberance without launching a product.
While some seasoned investors and cryptocurrency veterans scratch their heads approximately Tron, many see it as the exception and not the rule. Ryan Selkis, the CEO of Messari, a company attempting to build a database for standardized information approximately digital coins, famous that communities on Twitter and Reddit fill done decent jobs ferreting out examples of blatant scams and copied white papers, preventing faulty actors from getting too far.
That’s what happend with DADI, “a decentralized cloud computing company,” whose January token sale was called into question when users on Twitter began comparing passages of its proposal to that of a Russian company called SONM. In response, DADI decided to reach clean in a blog post.
“Yes, the copy in section 3.6.4 of our white paper is a mistake… but it’s one page out of 70 —  words out of 11,758,” the company wrote, before pulling its original white paper and uploading a recent version. “The words in dispute were left in the document from earlier research fabric and should fill been edited out: the details if were not representative of the current state of network development.”
Some investors would disappear on to believe them. DADI raised the equivalent of approximately $28 million from its ICO sale that finished at the conclude of January. It remains to be seen whether any of that will disappear toward the development of a working product. DADI CEO Joseph Denne did not respond to an emailed request for comment.
“Plagiarism is indicative that there is something fishy going on,” said Jerry Brito, the executive director of Coin Center, a Washington-based cryptocurrency lobbying group. “There are 1,500 tokens that I’ve seen and for a large percentage of those, I can’t justify why they fill any value. At some point reality is going to catch up.” ●
Charlie Warzel contributed additional reporting to this yarn.
Ryan Mac is a senior technology reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in San Francisco. He reports on the intersection of money, technology and power.
Contact Ryan Mac at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Got a confidential tip? Submit it here.
News moves hasty. retain up with the BuzzFeed News daily email!
You’re nearly there! Check your inbox and confirm your subscription now!