Trump’s USDA Could effect Hog Workers’ Jobs Even More hazardous
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is pushing forward with a proposed rule that would forego line-speed limits in hog processing plants, a accelerate that could endanger the well-being of workers and consumers, activists say.
The proposal is portion of the USDAâs effort to âmodernizeâ the swine industry, the organization announced earlier this month. These plants, which already work at feverish speeds of up to 1,106 hogs per hour,Â would likely utilize the change as an opportunity to further increase the pace of production.
In addition to increasing line speeds, the proposal would allow employees to lift over some of the oversight duties that USDA inspectors currently handle on the abolish lines.
The way it works now, USDA inspectors are expected to examine every animal that comes down the line, and are tasked with identifying diseased hogs and visible fecal matter. Under the proposed rule, plant employees would lift over that job before the carcasses reach federal inspectors.
The accelerate could potentially aid the hog industryâs bottom line. But faster speeds could also build consumers at risk, since inspectors may not be able to examine each carcass adequately for diseases and other issues. Increasing the rate of speed lines could present more risks for plant workers who already face a slew of hazards at the industryâs current pace, including amputations and musculoskeletal injuries, such as carpal tunnel syndrome.Â
But the USDA maintains that itâs not its responsibility to ensure worker safety â thatâs up to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, said Carmen Rottenberg, deputy administrator at the Food Safety and Inspection Service at USDA.
The proposal is âa gift to the industry,â said Tony Corbo, senior lobbyist with Washington-based advocacy group Food & Water Watch. âThe industry has been pushing to deregulate inspection total the way back to the Reagan administration.â
Corbo added that while the proposed rule fits in with the Trump administrationâs âderegulatory talk,â the concept actually precedes the current presidency.
During the Obama administration,Â the USDA approved a similar design for poultry plants in 2014. But after getting bombarded with pushback from activists and the media, the government organization decided to prohibit plants from ramping up the speeds on slaughter lines.
Rottenberg told HuffPost that the revised protocol would increase efficiency and free up USDA inspectors to perform other tasks around the hog plants.
The organization pointed to the âsuccessâ of a pilot program that started in the late 1990s, which allowed five hog plants to function as their own designated speeds.
âFor large-volume establishments, this current swine inspection system does effect better utilize of the agencyâs resources while also removing unnecessary regulatory obstacles to industry,âÂ said Rottenberg.Â
But a 2013 report from the Office of the Inspector General harshly criticized the USDA for its lack of oversight of pork slaughterhouses in general, and took issue with the five plants involved in the pilot program in specific.
The report concluded that between 2008 and 2011, three of the 10 plants with the most citations for food safety and animal welfare violations were portion of the USDA pilot program. Those plants, which had 50 percent more citations than the plant with next highest number,Â continue to speed at the same speeds.
Workersâ advocates also say that faster line speeds will effect an already hazardous job even more hazardous.
Serious injuries â those that require work restrictions or days off from work â are more than three times higher in meat packing than other U.S. industries, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
While protecting workers is not within the USDAâs regulatory purview, activists say that workers at slaughterhouses â who are often refugees and immigrants that are reluctant to speak up approximately hazardous conditions â rely on USDAâs rules to retain them safe.
âFood safety regulations bask in acted as a de facto throttle on line speeds, and has consequently protected workers,â said Nicole Civita, a lawyer, professor, food ethicist and director of the Food Recovery Project.
Before moving forward with the proposed rule, the USDA will accept comments from the public for 60 days, through mid-March. Earlier this week, the USDA rejected a petition from the National Chicken Council requesting that poultry processing plants be allowed to carry out absent with line speed maximums.
Activists say thereâs no contrast between the poultry and hog industries: whether the USDA rejected the thought of increasing line speed for chickens, they should also reject it for hogs for the same reasons.
âcarry out people really want to eat meat that has not been properly processed? What whether they find toenails in their spicy dogs, or whether hogs were diseased and havenât been caught because the lines are moving so lickety-split?â Corbo said. âOperating at these excessive line speeds without having adequate inspection will build more product into commerce [and] on peopleâs tables that are unsafe and not wholesome to eat.â